Work and Career Essays

by MS

Some people think one should stay all their life in the same job, whereas others advocate changing jobs from time to time.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

People tend to differ when it comes to the opinion whether one should change job frequently. On the one hand, many people think one should keep doing the same job all throughout the life where as other advise that is not the way to go. The merits of both the arguments will be analysed before a conclusion is provided.

Firstly, there are immense benefits that professionals enjoy sticking to a same job. But the most obvious ones are security and enhanced expertise in a specific domain that they gain during their tenure in the workplace. For example, a civil engineer who is designing the architecture of bridge for years knows all the nitty-gritty details of the factors for building a robust bridge. Because of his vast experience, his company will also be interested to retain him as the same level of competency cannot be expected from a newcomer. This supports the argument that continuing the same job over years has several positive facets.

However, many other people argue in favour of changing jobs recurrently. The main reason being when individuals work in several jobs they usually add more skills to their portfolio and this definitely improves their employability. For instance, when a wildlife photographer changes his job and joins an advertising agency, not only his skills get enhanced, he is also considered as more dynamic and versatile. Additionally, spending too long in a job also make people feel monotonous. This makes clear why the idea of shifting jobs is suggested.

After looking at these two opposing points of view, it is felt that changing jobs every once in a while is of more benefit. However, it is recommended that one should judge the situation prior to make a decision.

Changing Jobs

by rakez

Some people think that a person should change a career at least once, while others think that it is better to stay in one job for a lifetime.

What is your opinion?

In the modern days, it is quite a common fact that people change their job frequently. Because of the rise of employment opportunities in private sector companies, there is huge demand for the professionals. It is argued that majority of the employees move to other jobs due to various factors which enforces them to do so. The discussable points are firstly to achieve their personal and professional growth as well as to break their routine work culture in official activities, employees prefer to change their jobs.

Employees dream about their career to be increased form strength to strength. Hence in the need of fulfilling their goal, undergo the process of learning new skills and techniques for betterment of future. Considering an example, one of my friend had changed his job in couple of years as he was not able to achieve his professional dreams and desired work culture. The employees are also not hesitating to change the job if there are offered higher designation with hike in salary. After analyzing, professional growth is one of the reason for job change.

On the other hand, employees prefer to change their job, In order to break the monotony nature in the work atmosphere. For example, if the a typist in a company is bored with his daily routine work.Therefore, this boringness nature and monotony of the work will lead to search of a new job for the uplift of the career and as well the increase of financial status. Hence after analyzing the regularity and unexcitement in their work life is the cause for the job change.

To summarize, it is clear that to achieve personal,professional growth and routine nature are the main causes responsible employee’s job change. Thus, in the future, it can be expected that this percentage of employment change will be likely to increase.

Please provide feedback on this Work and Career Essay

Younger People in Government

by Ronald
(Mumbai)

Some argue younger people are not suitable for important positions in the government, while others think this is a good idea.

Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Important government positions in most of the countries are taken up by experienced people. Some believe that young people are more suitable for these jobs, others however, are not in favor of assigning positions to young crowd. It is agreed that the new generation will work better in such positions, provided they implement the latest concepts and techniques. This essay will discuss both the views before giving a reasoned conclusion.

The principal reason why young people are not considered for important jobs in administration is because they lack experience. In other words, an experienced individual will use his past knowledge and expertise to resolve the present issues. For example, in Indian parliament a question was raised whether to remove import duty, most of the young officers were in support of the bill, and later it was found that it was a bad decision. This clearly explains the importance of experience and the need to refrain young crowd from taking critical decisions.

On the other hand, it can argued that younger generation is more broad minded. This attitude will help the government take decisions based on latest trends and concepts. Although they lack the necessary experience, they will take care by referring to past case studies. Another point is that young generation will be more active and healthier than their older counterpart. Obviously, this will help them in carrying out their task easily.

In conclusion, the younger generation is more broadminded and is well versed with the current trends and technology; this will help them in outperforming their older counterpart. Personally, I agree with the fact that younger generations are more capable in performing vital administrative jobs.

***

What do you think of this Essay on Younger People in Government?

You can give your comments by clicking the link below.

Jobs and Artificially Intelligent Robots

by Martin Hanna

Some people believe that eventually all jobs will be done by artificially intelligent robots.

What is your opinion?

Please check my answer and feel free to comment.

There is no doubt that smart robots are substituting humans in many fields. Although many jobs can be overtaken by robots with human-like intelligence, it is unlikely that occupations that require human interactions can be carried out by smart machines. This essay will explore the reasons why a limited number of jobs will continue to be under humans’ control.

In my opinion, Robots will inevitably be in charge of all the jobs that do not need a special set of skills or deep understanding of human relations. This is due to the fact that robots can be programmed in a way that eliminates or minimizes errors or mistakes that humans usually commit, which certainly leads to a greater productivity. For example, in many construction companies, workers who specialize in laying interlock tiles are being replaced by robotic machines. This does not only increase the accuracy of the work, but it also reduces the occurrence of harmful incidents that accompany such type of activities.

Nevertheless, and despite the advancement of technology and science, there are still occupations that robots will not be able to perform. This is because certain jobs demand an extensive understanding of human behavior in addition to the technical training and knowledge. For instance, in order to diagnose and treat mental or psychological disorders, professionally trained psychiatrists are needed to interact with the patients directly. If, however, robots replaced human psychologists, a tremendous effort will be exerted by programmers to implement constant updates in the robots’ system, which I think is more challenging and less efficient. For these reasons, it is undoubtedly clear that not all professions can be run by artificial intelligence.

In conclusion, robots will most certainly replace humans’ roles in many positions. However, it is in my firm belief that there are multiple jobs that require essential human contact that intelligent robots cannot provide.

Dressing Smartly for Work Essay

by Mary
(Indonesia)

Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

In the professional field, one can argue that people work better when they look their best. However, others believe that appearance has zero correlation to work, and prefers highlighting their quality of work. This essay will discuss both views, particularly how certain jobs are required to look smart while some jobs do not.

In many careers, appearance is key in giving the best result. This includes sales and even a real estate agent. These certain jobs require them to persuade others to buy their "product" and often need to reflect a good smart appearance to gain success. For example, professionals in sales and real estate agent are required to wear stylish and smart clothes. Since they are closely connected to customers and clients, they need to look good to gain people's trust. Can you imagine if you wanted to buy a house from a real estate agent that only wears a t-shirt and some shorts? The sight might be unappealing for many, creating the impression of "unprofessionalism" or "unknowledgeable". This will negatively affect the brand of the company.

On the other hand, those working in the creative industry, such as visual artists, graphic designers, and musicians, don't need to wear smart clothes. Since their work tends to prioritize their creative art, people wouldn't seem to mind if they wear casual clothes. They don't need to look professional because their appearance is detached from people's opinions. For example, a graphic designer will showcase their portfolio, with just possibly wearing a simple t-shirt and jeans. A new client who meets him or her wouldn't mind, because their quality of work is reflected in the designs that they make and not their appearance.

In conclusion, I think in certain professions, it is crucial to look their best and to present a smart appearance. All of which is to pitch great sales and bring a good name to the company. However, in certain career fields, looks are not essential. Their designs, music, and other creative arts are prioritized rather than the clothes that they wear.

Reducing the Working Week

by Hayder Ahmed
(Leeds, UK)

The length of the working week does not reflect modern lifestyle needs. It should be substantially reduced to give people more leisure time and time with their families.

How far do you agree with this statement?

Day by day, the life is becoming more complex and very difficult and people work for long time in every day. It is agreed that the number of working day in a weak should be reduced to give workers more free time with their families. Analysing both difficulty and complexity of life nowadays as well as people work hard for long time will show this.

Firstly, today, the life is complex and people spend a long time working very hard without a rest time. For instance, people work from the beginning of morning to the end of evening very hard. When they back to their home, they might be tired and stressful. Therefore, people can not find a free time to talk and discuss with their families and spend enjoyable time with them. Thus, this makes it clear why people need for more free time every week.

Secondly, as people work hardly for a long time during a working day, they might be stress and their health could be not good. For example, when workers do their job, they will be standing all the time and sometime doing hard without a rest time. Thus, their body could be very tired and in a bad condition and this routine continues every day. From this, it becomes quiet evident that why decreasing the number of working day is important for people health.

In summary, people are working very hard for long time. Therefore, their health condition could be bad and they do not spend more time with their families. Thus, it is clear why the idea of increasing the number of working day can not be supported. After analysing this subject, it is predicted that the drawbacks of working a long time without rest more than benefits.

(295 words)

*****

I'd appreciate some feedback for my essay on work and careers.

Working Part-time while at High School

by Merlin

Some high (secondary) school students work part-time while some do not, instead just focusing on their studies.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of part-time jobs for high school students?

Many high school students take up jobs in their free time. Some parents discourage their teenagers from working while studying. Both these cases have good and bad points.

The students who take up part-time jobs become responsible. A job brings them income by which they get spending power. For example, a teen who works can use his money to buy his own text-books, pay for his lunch at the canteen, and also purchase personal things for himself. This reduces the burden on their parents especially in low-income families. These high school kids learn to spend wisely and hence tend to practice the art of saving for a future need.

There are also drawbacks of getting themselves employment. They can get distracted from their studies. This can happen because a student may want to put in more hours of work in order to earn more cash. As a result, he will spend more time working and less time focusing on his educational side. Another downside is that with money power in his hands, he could easily fall prey to bad habits like gambling, drugs and smoking. This can lead to destruction of his academics and ultimately destroy his future career.

Different homes are different when it comes to their financial state. Hence, low income groups might prefer if their children make a small earning to support themselves. However, high society people may not be in favor that their offspring gets employed as they feel it is below their status and , besides they can fund their teens.

Not Paying Taxes Essay

by Furkan

Some people believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn, and should not have to pay tax to the state.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Every citizen have to pay a amount of their income. Countries implement changeable income taxes that generally depends on people`s rich rate. You will be seen end of the this Essay, how we are returning paid taxes by government.

We use money every moment of our life for buying necessary things such an food, drinks and other costs to survive our life. And this provided product to us is controlling by government. There are massive official that they are working to supply our needs behind of this process. Those officials earn money from our taxes.

On the other hand, governments have very large of responsibilities on own citizens such a security, relationship with other countries that is for giving right when they left their country, service that is for every sector to survive their life.

To sup up, we have to pay taxes for this a lot of wheel can work. It is obligated rule for all citizens. Likely there are strict rules that someone reduce to pay income taxes , government do punish by fine or imprisonment .

site search by freefind	advanced

• Writing
• Reading
• Speaking
• Listening

• All Lessons
• Vocabulary
• Quizzes
  
• Videos
• Forum
• Band Score Calculator
• Writing Feedback
• Speaking Feedback
• Teacher Resources
• Free Downloads
• Recent Essay Exam Questions
• Books for IELTS Prep
• Useful Links