Immigration Essays

by Sevda

More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing, and medicine.

Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world.

What is your opinion?

Qualified people always seek to earn jobs in rich countries. Especially, these employees such as engineering and doctors move from their own countries to developed countries in order to attain jobs at high - standart companies. Some people claim that this type of movement between the rich and poor countries is natural process. Others feel that rich countries are stealing from poor countries by doing this. In my point of view, workers usually move to the rich countries due to main reasons.

First of all, rich countries offer huge salary. Because these countries have strong economic and financial status. That is why it is easy for them to hand workers this tremendous number of money per month. Today there are certain programs in some rich countries for those who has qualifications in specific areas. This kind of supporting leads to trade the benefits between rich country.

Secondly, it is unusual experience which the person have never had before. In spite of difficult studying chances there, people are able to practise their previous knowledge and earn plenty of skills with working at sophisticated companies. It also allow to increase their backgrounds at their majors.

Thirdly, it is not about a country, it is about a person. That is why rich countries offer individuals not country where they live in.

All of above prove that moving from poor to rich countries is natural process. It is not expressed with stealing people country to country. Instead of it, poor country should pay more attentions at the local problems in order to make these abmitious individuals staying in their original homes.

***
Please leave comments below on this Essay on Migrating to Another Country for Work to help the student improve their score.

Movement of People from Poor to Rich Countries

by Kamaljeet
(Ludhiana )

More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist area like engineering, computing and medicine.

Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world.

Discuss both opinions and give your opinion.

These days due to unemployment well educated people are migrating to developed countries. which is not good for their native country.

Some people think that the people who are well qualified from poor countries are given opportunity by rich countries, they are moving to those countries.

Due to this practice developed countries are becoming more developed and poor are becoming more poor. people think that is done intentionally by the rich countries. moreover they think their qualified people like doctors, scientists, engineers and many more moving to another countries, as the growth of the country depends on these people.

On the other hand, some people think that it's naturally happens. developed countries give opportunities to all people. they are not force anyone to join their companies, it's depends on the people they want to go or not.

In my opinion it is true that these days people are moving to another countries. the main reason of this practice is that the government of the poor countries do not take any steps to give opportunities to them according to their qualification. second reason is that people get more facilities in other countries as campared to their own. For instance, I have seen many people who do their studies in India and do not get any opportunities there and they move abroad as they offers good salary package and more facilities. it is clear from the above example that government should pay attention on this.

***
What do you think of this essay on the movement of people from poor to rich countries? How could it be improved?

You can provide comments on the essay below.

Impacts of Immigration

by Mona

More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. 


Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world.

Discuss both opinions and give your opinion.

Qualified workers always seek to be hired at rich countries for better life. Specifically, these employees such as engineers and doctors move from their developing to developed countries in order to acquire jobs at the high-standard companies. While some encourage this type of movement between the rich and poor countries and see it as natural process, others have seen that developed countries attempt to steal these educated people. In my point of view, workers usually move to the rich countries due to main reasons.

First of all, rich countries offer huge salaries for outstanding workers. Because these countries have strong economic and financial status, the incomes each year would be at peak rate. Eventually, it is easy for them to hand hard workers this tremendous number of money per month. For instance, France is one of the richest countries in the world, so there have been immigration programs for people, who have qualifications in unique specializations. This kind of supporting leads to exchange the benefits between the rich country and certified individuals.

Secondly, it seems to me that unusual experiences could be added to the qualified movers’ careers in developed countries. In spite of difficult studying chances there, people are certainly able to practice their previous knowledge and earn plenty of rare skills throughout working at sophisticated companies. Because these widespread institutions have chosen fully professional, educational, and talented people from all over the world, this would allow immigrants to increase their capacities and backgrounds at their majors. Steven Jobs is an excellent example for this circumstance. Before he has died, electronic computer employees have dreamed to move to the United States for learning from his long creative experience in technology. Still, many have came to his team to join and discover more about this science.

To wrap up, moving from poor to rich countries is excited these days, and qualified people should have the freedom to move where they want and improve their life’s pattern. This movement could not be expressed with stealing people from country to country. Instead, developing governments have to compete the rich countries and pay more attentions at the local problems in order to make these ambitious individuals staying in their original homes.

Please give me your opinion on my essay.

Living as a Non-native Speaker in Another Country

by Sierra

Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Language forms an important part of our everyday life. It serves as the means of communicating our desires, moods and feelings; therefore living in a country where we have to speak a foreign language can often pose not only social but also pragmatic problems.

The primary reason that one might face social issues while residing in a nation where they have to speak a non-native language is that they can feel conscious or insecure about their language proficiency, leading to excess stress and anxiety; therefore some trouble in making friends can be experienced. Uncertainties about their communication skills might hold them back from expressing themselves honestly and making valuable connections. Additionally, when one learns a second language, it tends to lie more on the formal side of the spectrum whereas in everyday life people use informal language, in such a scenario, individuals might face some adversity in comprehending other people’s statements. Culture differences can also be linked to language barrier, as one might be unaware about the suitable public behaviour; they can unknowingly offend the people around them.

Language barrier can also hinder one’s professional life. For instance, while trying to communicate with authorities one might misunderstand what is expected out of them and act inappropriately or fail to positively communicate about the troubles they are facing, this affects their rapport in the cooperate world and can stagnate their work life. Moreover finding a job can be difficult, as during interviews they might come off as hesitant under confident and uncomfortable in their surroundings.

In my opinion, living in a country where one has to adapt a second language does pose innumerable threats and can prove quite troublesome, but if people try and educate themselves about the culture they are surrounded by then these issues are bound to be resolved. Furthermore, native speakers can also be kinder and more accepting towards the non-native speakers.

Accepting Refugees Essay

by Adnan Jhan
(Islamabad, Pakistan)

Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing.

To what extent do agree or disagree?

Develop nations should allow additional migrants and they are responsible for arranging the basic facilities like food and accommodation. I believe that, because it is a moral duty and the developing countries can easily manage their expenses.

The primary reason why wealthy nations should welcome displaced persons is that as human beings they can provide a helping hand to them. It is essential to help each other during trouble. Needy people should not be isolated from such terrible situations to face the uncertainty that might cause death. Moreover, most of the time in the world innocent people are suffering a lot due to the status of their living. They need fundamental amenities of their lives which unfortunately they would not get them. For example, countries like the USA and Canada to receive one million refugees of Myanmar and care about their basic needs.

Another reason is that high-income nations are stable economically and can help people who run away from war regions. Allowing more human beings and provide them food and shelter not affect their economy. Furthermore, it is beneficial for the country as it can provide more employment to the migrants who may strengthen the workforce. For instance, Canada needs more employers in various sectors such as in construction areas. Certainly, it would be a chance to get their labor requirement from the asylum seekers and place them into a particular field.

To conclude, rich countries should not refuse to provide primary aid to the refugees because it is a humanitarian responsibility and does not cause any damage to the economy of the nation

site search by freefind	advanced

• Writing
• Reading
• Speaking
• Listening

• All Lessons
• Quizzes
  
• Videos
• Forum
• Band Score Calculator
• Teacher Resources
• Free Downloads
• Recent Exam Questions
• Books for IELTS Prep
• Useful Links