International Relations Essays
The money given to help poor countries does not solve the problem of poverty, so rich countries should give other types of help instead.To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that an enormous amount of money has been poured into impoverished nations to help them escape from poverty. While this solution is sometimes effective, I personally believe that financial aid does not fully tackle the problem, and other types of aid need to be implemented.
Firstly, money given to destitute nations does not always reach people in need. In developing countries, lack of transparency and an ineffective management system has enabled prevalent corruption in government. It is therefore likely that monetary support from other countries would bring about benefits to only governmental officials instead of the poor. Another problem with giving out money is that in most cases recipient countries do not have necessary resources such as manpower, technology, infrastructure or management system in place to make the best use of financial aid. For instance, in my country, a large amount of money from foreign governments was spent on building health care centers in rural areas, but those centers were soon abandoned or operated at less than one tenth capacity due to lack of health care professionals, lack of electricity and clean water, etc. Another illustration would be in agricultural field. We received monetary support from international funds to increase productivity of crops, but we had no experience in conducting researches before implementing a project, in project management and evaluation. As a consequence, a large amount of money was wasted on ineffective programs proposed by incompetent leaders.
Furthermore, it is undeniable that financial aid can sometimes do more harm than good, and worsen the situation in poor countries. Some developed countries gave out monetary support to ruling oligarchy in Africa under the name of economic development, but for hindered political reasons as well. They might want to gain international preference, to win support from their citizens before election, or to enhance their political influence in recipient countries, etc. In such cases how the money would be spent was not their concern. Leaders in recipient countries therefore used the money to strengthen their position, by enriching themselves or purchasing weapons to suppress opponents. Had it not been for the financial aid, people in these poor countries might have been able to overthrown their incompetent, greedy authority. Financial aid in this case became an obstacle for revolutions against dictatorship, social progress and poverty eradication.
In conclusion, monetary support alone could not eliminate poverty. Other types of help such as technological support, staff training, infrastructure development and management system improvement is required to handle the problem. ***Do you like this International Relations Essay?
You can add your comments below.
International Conflict Resolution
by Roxy Perry
Many people say that conflict between two countries should only be solved by the parties involved. Others say that other countries can take part in the resolution of the problem. ***What do you think of this Essay on International Conflict Resolution?
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Animosity between two countries often results to chaos and has gripped the world in terror. It has been centuries ago and yet, it is still prevalent among mankind along with sufferings and poverty for some countries.
Number of people said that the disagreement between two countries should only be addressed by the parties involved. This is because, for some reason, peace and understanding can only be achieved if particular leaders of both territories will try to talk and to figure out each other’s mistakes. Also, it was mentioned that if a certain country will take part, there’s always a chance of taking sides in which will bring more misunderstanding and problem to both parties. So it’s necessary to have an open-mind and an open-heart to bring a better solution that will benefit both parties without needing the help of other leaders overseas.
On the other hand, to easily eradicate the conflict, many people believed that it is still best to involve other powerful countries. They said that if an influential leader will pursue to solve the negative occurrence, there is a greater chance that one or even both parties will cease their arguments and will let the stronger nation conclude the issue/s. Thus, bringing the best solution and developing ideas that will resolve and will even prevent the conflict in the future. For an instance, USA as the most powerful country and consequently the leader of the United Nation, will order to layoff the conflict between two countries whose under the said organization, most likely take its instruction and follow future directions to come up with a justifiable agreement.
From my point of view, both arguments are acceptable and can definitely resolve conflicts. I think that giving both territories the chance to talk about the issue between the two of them, in peace and in the absence of struggle and warfare, will let them realize their own shortcomings, thus will settle the feud. While it is not a bad thing either for a certain country or nation to take part in resolving the issue/s, it is far more important to understand the reason behind why tensions and resentment between two countries arises. Without addressing the underlying roots of hostility; I believe that the two nations will be unable to build normal relationship in the near future.
You can leave comments below on the essay in order to help this candidate improve their IELTS score.
Click here to post comments
Return to IELTS Essay Feedback Forum.
Sharing Wealth Amongst Nations
by Chun Mei Chang
Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? ***What do you think about this International Relations Essay on Developed Countries Helping Developing Countries?
Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
The world economy is a complex juxtaposition of developed nations with futuristic ideology and the third world nations trapped in the medieval age. The necessity to bridge the gap between the two has aroused a controversial debate between sharing of wealth by the power laden countries and the governments of economically backward nations strategizing methods to become self-sufficient. An analysis of both sides of the coin will clarify the picture.
It is regarded as a moral obligation to help the weak which propagates the idea to offer financial assistance. Countries like Vietnam have been able to successfully make improvisations in its economy after years of external existence. Ethical reasons aside, industrialized countries cannot afford to let one section of the world stagnate in infrastructure and economy as it could ricochet back in forms like terrorism or spread of contagious diseases. One recalls the damages to the twin towers of the World Trade Centre, the kidnappings by Somalian pirates and the deadly SARS virus that intimidated the world.
However, most often than not, the money donated by developed nations is consumed by the corruption of the politicians of underprivileged nations. Conversely, even if the money is utilized for food and infrastructure development, it often culminates to the governments of such nations to become over-dependent on external assistance and encourages them to become lazy and ignore their own responsibilities. Even after receiving years of financial aid, countries like Afghanistan and some African nations are still relegated to the bottom of the economic charts.
Nevertheless, the governments of economically backward countries should show accountability after being trusted and elected by their people. History suggests that when governments start to strategize the economic future of their country, such nations taste prosperity. The efforts of the Chinese government to improve its economy has transformed China to a dictator of corporate expansion plans worldwide while Singapore ensured that it rocketed from one of the poorest countries in the 1960s to second on the list of the 2015 economic freedom index.
In conclusion, it would be prudent for governments of underprivileged countries to strategize infrastructure and economic development plans while it more fortunate counterparts can ensure aids during serious crisis and natural calamities.
What IELTS band do you think it may get?
You can leave your thoughts and comments below.
Danger of Global Trade to Local Industries
The free movement of goods across national borders has long been a controversial issue. Some people argue that it is necessary for economic growth, while other claim that it damages Local industries. ***I badly need 7 score in writing. Criticisms of my essay are also welcome thanks!
Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion.
Exporting and Importing goods are one of the sector in the industry that has always been a contentious topic in a country. Some citizen believed that exporting have benefits effect for the economic growth, while others contradict the importing may harm the local industries.
A wider distribution is a positive result to an open market. It may give an opportunities to established a broad trading relationship to the other countries. Goods that entered the international trade may gain more income not only to the workers and companies but for the country as well. Moreover, exporting products may raise the custom revenue of the country because before the investors have their merchandise to the local market, they have to pay for the alloted taxes as a result, these taxes may help to increase the gross sales of the country.
On the other hand, people may patronage the import goods rather than their own products. For instance, as today the Philippines import rice the the other Asians countries such as Thailand and Vietnam. People tend to buy these kinds of goods because they think that it have a more high quality standard as a result, the fall of local purchasing. As the local industries decline, many establishment and businesses tend to close their production due to decreasing profit, they can no longer support their production and as consequence, many locals loose their jobs.
One may conclude that exporting and importing goods may have favorable and unfavorable effects in a country. In my point of view, it is more wiser to pay more attention to the local industries than being dependent to the goods from foreign countries. With the support from the government and the unity of the workers and local companies to improve the quality of the local product that can be compare to the other products, people may patronize more local commodities and bring up also the gross revenue of the country.